SlayerZ's avatar

SlayerZ

Player

Steam ID: 76561198804004471

Normal matches only (80)

Match Statistics

Based on last 80 matches

~38m/match
A
80
LOCKBLAZE
Excellent

Win Rate

62.5%

50 Wins
30 Losses

Key Performance

KDA Ratio

6.94

2.9%

Most Kills

29

Average KDA

9.1/3.2/13.1

Last Hits per Minute

4.5

10.7%

Net Worth per Min

1235

9.3%

Per Minute Stats

Kills/min

0.23

Deaths/min

0.08

Assists/min

0.34

Denies/min

0.20

Win Rate by Game Duration

≤20 min

100.0%

(1/1)

21-30 min

71.4%

(5/7)

31-40 min

64.3%

(27/42)

>40 min

56.7%

(17/30)

All Time Stats

Total Kills

730

Total Assists

1,047

Total Denies

615

Total Last Hits

13,997

Total Souls

3,841,871

Hero Performance

Most Played Heroes

Paradox
ParadoxMarksman
30 games
56.7%
The Magnificent Sinclair
The Magnificent SinclairMystic
29 games
58.6%
Vindicta
VindictaMarksman
12 games
75.0%

Best Win Rates(min. 3 games)

Shiv
ShivBrawler
7 games
85.7%
Vindicta
VindictaMarksman
12 games
75.0%
The Magnificent Sinclair
The Magnificent SinclairMystic
29 games
58.6%

Performance Tracker

Recent game analysis & trends

Last 10 matches

Performance Status

inconsistent

High performance variance

Current win streak: 2 games

Win rate: 90% (9/10)

Average KDA: 12.75

Average deaths: 2.9 per game

Last hits: 175 per game

Recent KDA has declined by 11.2%

Recent win rate has declined by 20%

Performance Analytics

Win Rate
90%
Avg KDA
12.75
Last Hits
175
Farm/Min
4.6
Game Duration
37.6m
Consistency
Low
KDA Trend (Recent vs Older)
-11.2%
K/D/A
11.6/2.9/10.7
NW/Min
125
Denies
10.0

Performance Insights

Playstyle Analysis

Performance characteristics

CARRY
ECONOMY
FRONTLINE
UTILITY
OBJECTIVES
AGGRESSION
ECONOMY: 100%
FRONTLINE: 100%
CARRY: 89%

Player Archetype

Playstyle and strengths

Primary Archetype

Aggressive Initiator

83% confidence

Performance Metrics

Aggression
85%
Team Play
64%
Objective Focus
84%
Survival
72%
Utility
73%

Strengths

  • Excellent combat aggression
  • Great objective control
  • Excellent survivability
  • Effective utility usage

Areas to Improve